Wow, what will you deny next, that you need to eat, sleep, drink and shit to survive?
I'm not sure I want to waste my time on you because you're so completely ignorant and simply a trouble maker.
You're not educated, you're a denier.
Overcranking is the most crude form, it's been done with all types of cameras since the 1920's. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slow_motion
This is absolutely why NASA forced them to get their footage by filming the projector screen, they filmed at higher fps then played that footage back at a standard speed.
You also have no education in physics what so ever and your vocabulary definitions are equally as poor.
A particle is billowing on the moon, mars, in water. Billow simply means move in a wave like pattern.
Billowing is a really simple term, not a scientific term at all. Billowing has nothing to do with air pressure and is not an effect or force principle. Billowing takes place without air since a billow is simply a very
poor term for describing trajectory. It's not specific or relative.
The air is not a source of positive
energy in this case because it's placing friction upon the particle. So while this may cause it to move slower, more stable etc it's also simply going to make it move less
in most respects. Specifically, it will limit the particles travel in height while it may indeed prolong it's billow
or for the layman such as yourself, arc trajectory.
Yet the particle's billow on the moon in the footage hardly moves in trajectory upward and in it's arc without static pressure and friction of the earth to slow it down and cause resistance.
So feel free to chop up my posts all you like, counter them with your less than 9th grade education then snicker all arrogantly with your delusion of superiority and name calling because the fact is, you don't know the facts and have absolutely no understanding about anything you're saying.
You're literally a rude, smug, snide and arrogant know nothing know it all calling me names while defining words and principles that every educational source on the planet defining and explaining them is in total contradiction with your use and claimed definition. Billow
does not mean what you and the other propagandists try to make it mean. In fact, you try to make it a principle of aerodynamics which is both ridiculous and
I'm an open minded, level headed and very
well educated person which is a trait of the well educated and more importantly, intelligent that are able to then use that education to make observations, hypothesis, conclusions then prove or disprove them.
You're not doing that, you're just closing your eyes and putting your hands over your ears while you kick and scream terms of science producing nonsense.